![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
2.5-10x56 trijicon accupoint on AR? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
shooter2440 ![]() Optics GrassHopper ![]() Joined: September/29/2016 Location: Illinois Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: September/29/2016 at 15:15 |
Hello,
I have been hoping to get some thoughts from users in this forum. I am completing my AR build and have kicked around the idea of going after the trijicon 2.5-10x56 accupoint to put on my rifle. I plan on using this gun for coyote and hog. I became attracted to the 2.5-10 because of the large objective lens, giving me large field of view. I intend to zero it at 50 yards (so it shoots at flat again at around 200yds again, and only slightly high at 100), since I will not plan on making shots exceeding 250 yards. My only question is: has anyone experienced any issues with a 56mm, or similarly large, objective? Since it sits higher from the barrel, can i anticipate issues with shots somewhere between 25 and 250 yards? I am interested in the 2.5-10 because the low end power is lower than trijicon's 3-9x40, and the objective is larger. |
|
![]() |
|
supertool73 ![]() Optics God ![]() ![]() Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
a larger objective actually has nothing to do with larger FOV.
It will be brighter in low light at a higher mag than the 3-9x40 scope But as far as cleaning the objective. That shouldn't be an issue as long as you use a typical height AR mount. |
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|
![]() |
|
shooter2440 ![]() Optics GrassHopper ![]() Joined: September/29/2016 Location: Illinois Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you for correcting me, much appreciated. I'll probably end up throwing it in a Bobro mount. I appreciate the input. I just didn't want to overlook some issue that may come with a large objective.
|
|
![]() |
|
anweis ![]() Optics Master ![]() Joined: January/29/2006 Status: Offline Points: 1147 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rifles are like violins. They need to fit if you are to play well. Every single time i tried to shoot from field positions a rifle with a large scope representing 1/4 of the total weight of the rifle positioned well over the bore line i found that the rifle had a poor balance and i shot poorly.
As soon as i switched to a better balanced rifle with a smaller lighter scope i had no problem hitting the gong. Just this morning i shot a .375 with a small low mounted scope at 200 yards (seated, kneeling, leaning, and prone). I hit 60 out of 60 times into the 6" gong. When the rifle had a high mounted 50 mm scope (high rings), i hit less often. If you carry the concrete shooting bench with you in the woods, it makes no difference. Just something to think about.
|
|
![]() |
|
Rancid Coolaid ![]() MODERATOR ![]() ![]() Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have owned both, used both quite a bit in the field. The 3-9 is plenty bright and much smaller, I still have it. The 2.5-10 sat on a 16" barrel AR that was always run suppressed, weight wasn't the primary issue, but it is a large scope for such a small gun, just be aware.
Both are great in low light. |
|
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
|
![]() |
|
koshkin ![]() MODERATOR ![]() ![]() Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13178 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 2.5-10x56 is a nice scope if you plan to use it in very low light. It is a bit heavy and on most ARs, it would not be my choice. However, if this is for night use, then it is a good way to go.
ILya
|
|
![]() |
|
shooter2440 ![]() Optics GrassHopper ![]() Joined: September/29/2016 Location: Illinois Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the feedback.
My rifle has a 16" barrel and a Magpul PRS stock with the adjustable stock. I intend to use this as a range, hog, and coyote rifle. I am not too worried about the weight and I should be able to line up behind either scope with the adjustable stock so in that issue, I'm not too worried about the scope sitting a little high off the bore. The 3-9x40 is a 1in. tube, 12.4in, weighing 13.4oz. The 2.5-10x56 is 30mm tube, 13.8in., weighing 20.7 oz.
|
|
![]() |
|
Rs130754 ![]() Optics GrassHopper ![]() ![]() Joined: June/01/2017 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Old thread but still relevant as I am in the same position as shooter2440. The search feature answered a lot of questions. Since this is a 4 year old thread is there anything new that someone would recommend for the same purposes? I'm leaning towards the Trijicon 3-9 with a triangle post. I need a different set up than my Leupold 1.5-5x24.
|
|
![]() |
|
mike650 ![]() Optics God ![]() Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14528 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Trijicon 3-9x40 will be relevant to big game hunting until the day they stop making ‘em... and beyond. 👍
Edited by mike650 - December/14/2020 at 08:32 |
|
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
|
![]() |
|
tejas ![]() Optics Journeyman ![]() Joined: March/08/2010 Location: Lone Star State Status: Offline Points: 575 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |