OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Firearms, Bows, and Ammunition > Reloading & Ballistics
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ballistic program differences
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

Ballistic program differences

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
tucansam View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: February/05/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tucansam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Ballistic program differences
    Posted: November/04/2017 at 22:02
I have a conundrum brewing.

I am using Shooter, Strelok Pro, JBM, and Hornady's calculator from its website.

Using the *exact* same input data, all four calculators are giving me different output, and some of it is off by as much as a full mil at distance (700y)

Based on real-world testing, Strelok appears to be the closest so far, but I have a lot more testing to do.

I'm confused.  While I accept that each program may use slightly different formulas, or apply atmospherics slightly differently, or flat out contain errors, I'm shocked that all four well-known calculators would be so far out of agreement.  This is especially troublesome given the magnitude of popularity of these programs over the last ten years or so -- I assume each one would be fully mature and tested by now, given various user reviews of each.

Does anyone have any comment?

Thanks.
Back to Top
cstumpf750 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: November/14/2016
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cstumpf750 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November/04/2017 at 23:11
I’d suggest taking a look at this system.

https://ballisticxlr.com/

The author is very knowledgeable and helpful. He’ll be able to explain the discrepancies you are seeing better than I can. But it really comes down to GIGO (garbage in garbage out) and bad assumptions.
Back to Top
tucansam View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: February/05/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tucansam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November/04/2017 at 23:50
Thanks, I have been looking at his software for a while and may drop the hammer on it.

GIGO I understand, what I am confused about is four different outcomes using the exact same data (even if it is garbage)
Back to Top
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 9015
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rancid Coolaid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November/05/2017 at 08:26
I’ve used a few calculators in my time, and none are dead on at anything beyond 500-600 yards. This can be attributed to many factors,all of which lead to the same conclusion: Dope is specific to your gun, your ammo, your conditions, your eye, and your trigger pull.

Calculators are all about convenience. When used properly, they are a framework on which you build your data table.

Much like the guy that thought his rifle was zeroed because his scope was bolted to the gun, there is work to be done after most people call it “good.”

A rifle data book is infinitely more valuable to me than is a ballistic calculator. You should be logging every possible variable with every squeeze of the trigger. If yoi’re really serious about it.
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.