New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Difference between cameras with good optic zoom...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Difference between cameras with good optic zoom...

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options Page  < 12
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: November/02/2015 at 19:42
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11264
Originally posted by qpalzm qpalzm wrote:

Do you know of any other published analysis (from other reputable sources) that analyze it as you do?



Honestly, I never bothered to look, so I am not sure.  It would be uncommon to compare a small sensor DSC with a large sensor DSC though.  The results are too predictable, so it is not very interesting.

Of the small sensor superzoom cameras, the P900 is probably the best bet.  They all use comparable imagers and the lens on the p900 is surprisingly decent.

Like most cameras of this type it has extremely (in my opinion) heavy handed approach to noise reduction and sharpening.  

That is the decision for you to make: do you want the far reach or the better image quality?

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/06/2016 at 13:19
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Think I will be buying the p900 in the next few days..thanks guys for your thoughts!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/07/2016 at 21:04
Bitterroot Bulls View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: May/07/2009
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 3407
Please report back!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/08/2016 at 14:31
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Is $725 (Canadian) a good price for this camera? (including tax)


Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/29/2016 at 13:56
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
I received it today but I am currently charging the battery!
Will provide some thoughts in the next little bit!


Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/29/2016 at 15:43
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
So a bit of a dumb question.

I still need to get a memory card but should the zoom option be able to work without the memory card? (as i'm not actually storing a pic or taking a vid)


Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/29/2016 at 19:16
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Wow. 

I hope that I'm missing something here but not impressed. I know that this is not a low light camera, but even with decent lighting at subject/object, i just can't see anything all that clearly. Second, it doesn't appear to be able to zoom as far as it really says (without giving too much vibration/shaking) or really degrading picture quality. Third, I often have to wait a good 5-10 seconds for the black screen to go away so i can actually see the view (the camera constantly seems to turn off the display/tun it back on)..very annoying.

I have it set for manual zooming..but im not sure if some other settings need to be changed?

Cheers for any help
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/29/2016 at 22:30
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11264
TO use that much telephoto handheld, even with the built-in stabilization takes a little technique.

Still, the rest of the things you are reporting are odd, so perhaps you need to flip through the manual and/or call Nikon.

Also, I would like to point out that regardless of what the spec says, ultra long telephoto is sorta complicated and I'll be very surprised if you get any sort of respectable image quality anywhere near the spec'ed extent of the telephoto.  If you get somethimg decent at 1200mm equivalent, consider it a lucky day and stop right there.

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 08:52
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
I'll check it out more..but I also now agree that doing any sort of observation with cameras is sort of brutal.


Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 09:59
Son of Ed View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar

Joined: June/18/2011
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 55067
Originally posted by RifleDude RifleDude wrote:

More light in the scene simply allows you to use lower ISO, which means less digital noise, which means better image quality.

For years I have been wondering what is the significance of ISO on digital cameras since they're not using film.  My daughter's camera ( a Canon D6 ) is brighter with faster lenses and I thought faster lenses simply allowed you to SEE the picture as your eyes saw it, rather than being unnaturally dark.  

I get it ( kind of...)  ....NOISE!!   Whatever    My daughter's f 1.8 lens ( Voigtlander or Zeiss, I forget ) actually makes nighttime look a half hour earlier!!  Stare



     Bucky





Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 11:55
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Originally posted by koshkin koshkin wrote:

Nikon P900 offers a lot of zoom, but not all of it us truly usable.  Still, out to 1800mm, it is surprisingly decent.

As far as overall image quality goes, it is decent for the price and for the reach you get, but ultimately very mediocre (Canon SX50 mentioned earlier is somewhat similar if not worse).

The decision really comes down to how much magnification you are looking for.  P900, to me, has a very limited range of applications due to noise imaging pipeline and limited dynamic range.  You need a lot of even lighting to make that long zoom lens work.

If I were buying a bridge camera today, I would be taking a close look at Panasonic FZ1000, Sony RX10 Mark II and Canon G3X.  As an allround camera, the FZ1000 is probably your best bet for the money.  All three do quite well, all things considered, in low light.

While none of these have as much reach as the P900, they actually deliver quality images in a variety of conditions.

To address another question i saw earlier in the thread: if you attach your cellphone to an eyepiece of a binocular, the effective focal length of your observation system is the equivalent focal length of the lens in your cell phone multiplied by the magnification factor of the binocular.

For example, if you are using a 8x42 binocular with an iPhone 6, the effective focal length you end up with is 8x29=232mm.

If you use your iPhone with a spotting spotter that can go all the way out to 60x, you end up with an effective focal length of 1740mm.  

I like phonescoping (which is apparently a real term), but I use a much higher resolution Lumia 1020 phone for it, so I can get the combination to reach very far.

The biggest advantage of using a spotter or binocular with a cellphone is that digital cameras are not designed for observation, regardless of how much detail the camera may be capturing, seeing it on that small screen is difficult for any prolonged observation.

ILya



I have to say that you were right. I think i've played enough with the settings to see that it's not me making a mistake that's causing me to be disappointed by this camera.

1. About the observation.. Staring at that screen while zooming is not realistic for any long period of time. Not good for observation.

2. I have shaky hands..this can't be really solved. It's not a huge problem, but it's enough of a problem that in combination with zooming in far enough, and me shaking a bit, picture quality is bad.

3. This camera is not ideal for any type of low light situation. Even when there is decent lighting..I can still see my object better with my $200 binocular than with this camera. I don't really agree (At least with this camera) with the person that said that camera tends to give you a better image and binos less so. This in large part was what sold me. I got the impression that when i looked at the screen of the camera (or at least the actual pic/video after) that the quality would impress me. In night, with at least some light, it's not better than my $200 binocular.





Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 13:09
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
After giving that beautiful and rave review..I'm open to selling it. I'm in Canada (since the Canadian dollar is quite weak) you guys can get a good deal.

I'll sell it for $770 Canadian (which is $550 American). You not only save $50 but you save on taxes. (and if you are not too far, I'll pay full for shipping) As I said I've only had it a couple days.

Despite my poor reviews, you should realize that I'm not very good with technology (so I could be possibly missing something) + it isn't exactly ideal for my uses.

Cheers!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 15:38
Urimaginaryfrnd View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Resident Redneck

Joined: June/20/2005
Location: Iowa
Status: Offline
Points: 14048
I miss the simplicity of just push processing TMAX 3200 and then printing it myself. Whatever
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 15:44
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Originally posted by Urimaginaryfrnd Urimaginaryfrnd wrote:

I miss the simplicity of just push processing TMAX 3200 and then printing it myself. Whatever
haha. I'm sure you are commenting at what I said...again I will read the manuals more..but this is not brain surgery. i looked at the manuals..changed to the settings it told me to change ..and still wasn't pleased.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 20:53
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14560
Originally posted by RifleDude RifleDude wrote:

Low light + heavy zoom + quality images = mega $$$. There's just no way around that fact.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/30/2016 at 21:44
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Originally posted by RifleDude RifleDude wrote:

Originally posted by RifleDude RifleDude wrote:

Low light + heavy zoom + quality images = mega $$$. There's just no way around that fact.

You really hit the nail on the head with that post. I think I got caught up in watching videos of that camera and it seemed to make me look past some of the posts..but to be honest i've never seen really use this camera during the night.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/31/2016 at 09:14
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
ps ebay sucks. Someone bought my camera, turned out to be a Nigerian scammer..now have to wait 10 days to be able to re-list!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/31/2016 at 10:29
Son of Ed View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar

Joined: June/18/2011
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 55067
...that's probably racist!    Whatever
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/31/2016 at 11:04
qpalzm View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/17/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Originally posted by Son of Ed Son of Ed wrote:

...that's probably racist!    Whatever

what?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  < 12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Difference between cameras with good optic zoom..."
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Adarondack Optics and Digital Camera scopes? aero_ub Rifle Scopes 1
Good optics for someone partially color blind? cropslx Rifle Scopes 6
Wow! Differences in optics quality jonoMT Rifle Scopes 20
Night Optics USA any good? manic1 Tactical Scopes 2
Eagle Optics Raven Spotter - any good? greywolf Spotting Scopes 7 11/5/2005 9:10:28 PM
Good .22 caliber rifle needs a Good fixed scope shooter4 Rifle Scopes 11
High mag zoom scope jcl Target 13
Thoughts On The Zoom-Dot? sholling Tactical Scopes 20
6 factor zooms - pros and cons Palehorse Rifle Scopes 4
Millet zoom dot. sodak Tactical Scopes 8


This page was generated in 0.469 seconds.