Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Finland Low Light Scope Test |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
Gunshow75
Optics Apprentice Joined: December/23/2004 Location: Kentucky, USA Status: Offline Points: 209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: July/17/2008 at 13:22 |
The following information is about a test of scope performance in low light levels done in Finland. The data were made available by an individual who is identified as Low Light Hunter. Tom B.
From: LowLightHunter Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:00 am To: MrGman. Here is a test from a Finnish magazine where a bunch of scopes where tested. A test board with E letters in different sizes on separate levels(the same as used for the driving tests) where placed 110 yards away. The test results show how many rows could be seen through the scope at different times during the evening. If a minus (-) sign is placed after the row number, it means that it could not be determined where the E pointed (up, down, left or right). The test results are in Finnish, but here is a translation table: - riv = row - ei näy = could not be seen The test where done during winter time conditions. Here are the test results: Burris 2,5-10x44 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 1 riv.- 20.00: ei näy Bushnell 2,5-10x50 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 1 riv.- 20.00: ei näy Bushnell 3-9x50 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv.- 20.00: ei näy Docter 2,5-10x48 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv.- 20.00: 1 riv. Docter 3-12x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 1 riv. Kahles 2,5-10x50 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 1 riv. Kahles 3-12x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 1 riv. Karl Kaps 2,5-10x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 1 riv. 20.00: 1 riv.- Leupold 4,4-14x50 17.00: 3 riv.-17.30: ei näy 20.00: ei näy Meopta 3-12x50 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv.- 20.00: 1 riv.- Meopta 3-12x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv.- 20.00: 2 riv.- Schmidt&Bender 1,5-6x42 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 1 riv. 20.00: 1 riv.- Schmidt&Bender 2,5-10x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 2 riv.- Shirstone 4-12x56 17.00: 2 riv.-17.30: ei näy 20.00: ei näy Swarovsik 2,5-10x42 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 1 riv. Swarovski 2,5-10x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 2 riv.- Zeiss 2,5-10x50 17.00: 2 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 2 riv.- Zeiss 1-12x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 2 riv.- The following info is for a different test. Tom B From: LowLightHunter Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:55 pm Ok, the test was conducted in the following conditions. 19 scopes with 56mm objective and illuminated rectile or red dot were chosen. A silhuette of a deer was placed out on a field abt 20 feet away from the testers. Then they waited for the sun to set. They looked through the scopes and when it was not possible to see the deer anymore, they put the scopes away. Scopes tested were the following: Barska Euro Pro 3-12x56IR Docter Classic 3-12x56R Docter Unipoint 3-12x56R JahtiJakt 4-16x56 Kahles CBX 3-12x56L Leupold VX-L 4,5-14x56 Luger PRO-NA 3-12x56 Meopta Meostar R1 3-12x56RD Micro Dot 2,5-10x56 Night Force 3,5-15x56NF Nikon Monarch E 2,5-10x56 SF M IL Schmidt & Bender Zenith 2,5-10x56 FD LM Swarovski 2,5-10x56 L LD Vixen VF 2,5-10x56 Weaver Classic Extreme 2,5-10x56 SF Zeiss Classic Diavari 3-12x56 T* Zeiss Victory Diavari M 3-12x56 T* Zeiss Victory Varipoint 3-12x56 T* Zeiss Victory Diarange M 3-12x56 T* At 4pm the deer was difficult to see the deer without a scope. Also at 4pm the first scope was put to the side. This was Barsk. The next seven in the order of how difficult to see were Luger, Vixwn JahtiJakt, Weaver, Leupold, Micro Dot and Nikon. All within 40minutes (4pm - 4:40pm). With the rest of the scopes it was still possible to see the deer picture to be able to make a shot at it. The moon started to give some light, so the deer picutre was moved to a darker place. After that the scopes were put in an order by which it was hardest to see the picture and so on. The two scopes that fell out first were Meopta and Schmidt&Bender. The next two scopes were Kahles and Docter Classic It was still somewhat possible to see the outlines of the deer with Docter. The next two were Docter Unipoint and Zeiss Diarange. Zeiss Victory Varipoint was a bit better than the last two. Swarovski PVI-2 and Zeiss Classic Diavari were on the same level, a little better than the varipoint. The last scope on the table was the Zeiss Victory Diavari. The test also included other parameters which I will not mention, simply because the test was 6 A4 pages and I am only interested in the low light performance. They also measured light transmission, which gave totally other results. But what counts in the end is what you see through the scope and not the measured numbers. Please note that this is my translation of a test that was conducted in a Finnish hunting magazine last month. I do not take any responisbility of the outcome of the test itself. To MrGman, the scopes that I would recommend is Meopta Meostar and Docter Classic. They are good low scopes for low light hunting at a reasonable price. The best you can get, if you are prepared to pay, is of course Zeiss Diavari, both victory series with loctec coating and the classic series. For daylight hunting only I would for sure chose another scope. From: LowLightHunter Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:59 am Sorry It should be 55 yards! They put the deer picture 55 yards out in the field. 55-110 yards is quite a normal distance for low light hunting on deer or wild boar. I rearranged the data from the first test in the order of most to least Es seen at 8 PM. Tom B Zeiss 3-12x56 17.00: 3 riv. 17.30: 2 riv. 20.00: 2 riv.- |
|
Tom |
|
8shots
Optics Jedi Knight Lord Of The Flies Joined: March/14/2007 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 6253 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Excellent stuff. I found this very interesting. Who would expect to see Leupold so low on the list. OK , don't all shout at once!!!
|
|
cyborg
Optics God Gaseous Clay Joined: August/24/2007 Location: North Georgia Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Great info here. This should be a prime example for those needing lowlight ability.
|
|
With Freedom comes great responsibility, you cannot have one without the other
An armed public are citizens. A disarmed public are subjects. OATH KEEPER #8233 Support us, and join our cause. Cyborg |
|
BSA
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/26/2008 Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The test sort of confirms what I have thought and that is the glass on the top of the ine Zeiss scopes is probably the best available. I do like the retical choices and mechanical features on some of the other scope brands better then Zeiss. |
|
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Looking at the list they left out a couple of the top shelf big three scopes, but great info all the same!! |
|
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
|
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The Nightforce 3-15x56 is on the list, but not in the results section. Where did it fall in the out come?
|
|
Gunshow75
Optics Apprentice Joined: December/23/2004 Location: Kentucky, USA Status: Offline Points: 209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I did not leave out the results by accident: LowLightHunter did not include the Nightforce in his commentary.
The results of a 2004 test of rifle scopes, done in Scandinavia, includes a Nightforce NP 1, 3.5x15, 56. See:http://www.zeiss.se/4125680F002BA25A/EmbedTitelIntern/Vapentidningen/$File/Vapentidningen.pdf |
|
Tom |
|
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Very good information. Based upon "eyes" the results may vary a little, but I would think this is very close to "the way it is". Thank you.
|
|
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|
realist
Optics GrassHopper Joined: July/17/2008 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have used just about every brand of scope out there in my time.
they all have there good and bad points to them.
if you could put them all togather in one scope, then you got something to talk about.
bottom line is the zeiss conquest 3x9x50 is the best over all scope I have ever used.
I have taken many deer,elk,bear,and moose in very low almost dark with no light.
the zeiss optics were the best I have ever looked threw in low light.
from a well seasoned hunter.
|
|
jonbravado
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Status: Offline Points: 1131 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
although conquest is a great scope and an excellent value - the zeiss diavari is noticably better - but you pay for it dearly.
zeiss is a great scopemaker. period.
J
|
|
noluv
Optics GrassHopper Joined: July/24/2008 Location: uk Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
verry interesting read buddy.
never thought much of leupold scopes, only vxiii and up really. a lot of budget type scopes missed out. thank you for good post |
|
SAKO75
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/29/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 246 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
like to see them test a VX-7
|
|
Obi Wan Kenobi
Optics Apprentice Joined: December/21/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 188 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the info. Doesn't surprise me one bit though. I knew Zeiss would be the best. I have a Zeiss Diavari 3-12X56, its worth every single penny.
|
|
Obi Wan Kenobi
Optics Apprentice Joined: December/21/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 188 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yep.
Thats the problem with Zeiss. They refuse to expand their line up & create better options for the US market like Swarovski. I guess they figure 2.5-10 & 3-12 has everything covered. I wish they'd make a 4-16 in the Diavari line. The 6-24 is just too much.
|
|
BSA
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/26/2008 Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I wonder why Zeiss does not offer their Hensoldt line of scopes here.....I think they would compete well against the S&B PM scopes
|
|
noluv
Optics GrassHopper Joined: July/24/2008 Location: uk Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
excellent,
needs to be made a sticky. and theres me thinking leupold may be worth the money.. |
|
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
z6 too. Edited by mike650 - July/31/2008 at 18:26 |
|
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
|
Gunshow75
Optics Apprentice Joined: December/23/2004 Location: Kentucky, USA Status: Offline Points: 209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Other than the shape of the objective lenses, what are the differences in the VX-7 and the VX-L? Are the lens coatings and the glass identical? |
|
Tom |
|
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The vx-7 has Twilight Lens System with Diamondcoat2 coating while the vx-l has Index Matched Lens System with Diamondcoat (1) coating.
|
|
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
|
Gunshow75
Optics Apprentice Joined: December/23/2004 Location: Kentucky, USA Status: Offline Points: 209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The functional test of being able to see a deer in falling light had the Leupold VX-L being the 6th of 18 scopes listed to drop out. I am not well enough informed to even make a SWAG about how the VX-7 would have done.
|
|
Tom |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |