New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: SWFA Scope Scale Discussion Thread (2009)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

SWFA Scope Scale Discussion Thread (2009)

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 12>
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
swtucker View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: September/03/2008
Location: Low Moor
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1203
  Quote swtucker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: SWFA Scope Scale Discussion Thread (2009)
    Posted: April/05/2009 at 18:13
Are Vortex Razor's new scopes? 
Back to Top
RONK View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: April/05/2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2950
  Quote RONK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 18:18
Originally posted by 257WM_CDL-SF

i had read several posts the optics of the big sky were better than 4200  but ranks below  it
 
I've heard both ways regarding Sightron's optical quality, some slightly above and some slightly below the 4200 Bushnell. Obviously pretty close, and obviosly pretty good glass in each.
 However, I've heard of several mechanical failures in Sightron's line, out of proportion to what I imagine is a far greater number of 4200 units afield. (Maybe I'm incorrect in assuming that Bushnell outsells them, Chris may offer his insight to that.)
 I've personally seen astonishing examples of the 4200s ability to handle GROSS abuse.
 I must tentatively agree with that ranking, based on admittedly limited knowledge...
Back to Top
Urimaginaryfrnd View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar
Resident Redneck

Joined: June/20/2005
Location: Iowa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5879
  Quote Urimaginaryfrnd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 18:22
According to John Barness the Trijicon Accupoint glass is made by Light Optical Japan same place Nightforce glass is made.  I really think that the glass combined with the illuminated reticle places it at the level of the Bushnell 6500.  This is one I think is way under rated but the new TR23 will tell the tale.  Eaven if it was at the level of the 4200 that might be realistic but hunting being the weighted area I think the illuminated reticle of the Trijicon or the  B&C & varmit reticles of the Leu VX3  make those scopes way more deadly  that a duplex 4200.   From the Accupoints I have seen in the last several years I think the glass has improved and the 2.5-10 scope I find vastly preferable to the 3-9 version even though I typiclly dont like a larger objective.

Edited by Urimaginaryfrnd - April/05/2009 at 18:26
>>>=============>

OT's Least Politically Correct
Back to Top
Al Nyhus View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: March/08/2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 111
  Quote Al Nyhus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 18:48
     Let me get this right: of those people listed that made up this rating chart.......durablity is only a 15% consideration to them? Shocked
 
    If that's true, I'm completely out of step.......Roll Eyes
Back to Top
John Barsness View Drop Down
Optics Optimist
Optics Optimist


Joined: January/27/2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 679
  Quote John Barsness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 18:51
I am pretty much going to stay out of this, except to point out that even though a lot of different optics are made in the same factories that doesn't mean they are all the same.
 
The same factory can make different lenses for different companies, and glass isn't the only factor in optical quality. The entire system (including interior baffling or matting) will make a difference, so "same factory" doesn't mean anything absolute.
Back to Top
Shenko View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: April/20/2008
Location: WA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 67
  Quote Shenko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 18:52
Giving more weight to durability would be great, in my opinion.
The part that surprised me was:
Bushnell Elite 3200, Leupold VX-II, Millet Tactical/Buck Gold, Nikko Stirling, Nikon Buckmaster, Sightron SI & SII, Vortex Crossfire & Diamondback, Super Sniper Fixed
on the same line.
Are you really rating the SI and Crossfire equal to the SII and Diamondback?
 
Back to Top
tahqua View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5018
  Quote tahqua Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 19:08
Still the best bench mark I've seen put together for us hunters in the optics crowd.
I have a Leapers and they are right where they belong. Cost effective for a day light scope, that's it.
Considering how the Kahles have always been listed, we can't get new 1.5-6x42's on this side of the pond.
Back to Top
Monster View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: December/16/2008
Location: So. Cal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1488
  Quote Monster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 19:41
Tough list to put together. From what I read and what I know the Nikko Sterling needs to be moved down. They are not in the same class as the SS, Nikon Buckmaster, 3200, etc.
"Get Busy Livin' or get busy dyin'" -Red (Shawshank Redemption)
Back to Top
John Barsness View Drop Down
Optics Optimist
Optics Optimist


Joined: January/27/2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 679
  Quote John Barsness Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 20:41
Al,
 
Evidently we have a friend in common, Steve Timm.
 
I am right with you on the durability issue. I have seen the judgment of scopes swing completely from reliability to "what can I see?" in the past 15-20 years.
 
JB
Back to Top
Horsemany View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: February/28/2008
Location: Nebraska
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 599
  Quote Horsemany Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 20:47
I'd agree with the above.  I was a little shocked to see "optical quality 51%" and "durability 15%".  I can't imagine what scenario of scope use those proportions are in the best interest of the shooter.

Edited by Horsemany - April/05/2009 at 20:48
Back to Top
RONK View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: April/05/2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2950
  Quote RONK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 21:01
 Well, it may be that durability was a more important factor in the past than it is to many modern hunters. What I mean is that a huge proportion of young hunters seem to think that hunting is sitting in a blind on a deer farm.
 Whole different thing than a bear hunt running behind a hard-driving pack of hounds or a ten-day pack-in elk hunt in the Rockies...
 Not trying to make "value judgements" here, to each his own. 
 Just saying.
Back to Top
hunter12345 View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: November/21/2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 470
  Quote hunter12345 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/05/2009 at 21:08
The new Sightron S3 has been noted as being the best optics being made in Japan.The Sightrons are still a good scope with one of the best warranties in the business.SWFA admin has pointed out a flaw in there performance.I hope someone from Sightron could respond because this forum has showed numerous positive responses of the new S2 Big Sky which I own and find very reliable. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.