Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Best 8x42 binoc under $500 |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
wildnorthern
Optics GrassHopper Joined: November/27/2006 Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: November/13/2010 at 17:12 |
What is the best binoc in the 8x42 class for under $500?
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It would be the Zen Ray ZEN ED2. No other competition. The Leupold Gold Rings are on sale and have a $100 rebate, but even with that they are nearly $600, but still a heck of a deal as well.
Edited by Klamath - November/13/2010 at 18:08 |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
Smileydawg1
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/22/2010 Location: Georgia Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What about the Kahles 8x42? how do they stack up to the Zen Ray?
|
|
NDhunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/15/2006 Status: Offline Points: 601 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
they are nice optically, but for build quality I do give the nod to the quality Austrian made, vs. the chinese
Zenray.
I guess sometimes it comes down to what you are looking for. Some of these quality made types
can last a lifetime. Some others may not be up to the same. There is a lot of fanfare for these newer
ones, and so that remains to be seen. If you could pick them both up, and handle them for a while
you would sure see what I mean.
I may compare it to purchasing an Audi, vs. a KIA.
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Audi vs. KIA?
I don't know about that. Unless the KIA outperforms the Audi, but looks a little cheaper. One true story: A friend is using my Zen ED 10X43s while his Kahles are at Gamo USA for repair. I will say the Zens "feel" a little cheaper than the Euro/High-End Japanese binos, but mine are standing up to some serious abuse. My friend and I are in full agreement: The Zens are optically superior to the Kahles. I really like the Kahles focus wheel, though. |
|
-Matt
|
|
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'd also take the Zen ED2 over the Kahles any day. They are optically fantastic and very tough so far.
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The Kahles, for all their "european pedigree" aren't much of an improvement over the Nikon Monarch. Better, yes, but not on the same level as the ZEN ED 2.
Since the original question was about the best less than $500 binocular, I maintain the ZEN ED 2 has no peer, untill something better comes along. That is with the caveat that this is based on the original announced sale price. There are some good deals out there now for this price range on some end of life models, and end of year move some inventory sales, for that price range.
Now the simple fact, as I see it, is that the ZEN ED 2 is pretty typical of the build found on pretty much all of the mid price glass today. That build quality is stout enough to be a non issue over most uses and unless durability is a serious concern for your use it is pointless to argue about. It is a $450 binocular with a $1,000 plus view. Ideal candidate for the answer to the original question IMO.
I buy stuff to use it. It does not matter what kind of gear it is. If the ZEN ED was not good enough to use, I'd have found out about it by now. If I found it to be lacking there, I would have said so by now and my opinion of it would be less than what it is now.
|
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I did just see a fllyer from the competitor........Leupol GR HD 8x42 for $479 after rebate. Fantastic glass at a fantastic price, and built like a tank.
Edited by Kickboxer - December/10/2010 at 11:05 |
|
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have the Zen II's and GR both in 10x42--I have put them both through the paces--I like the feel of the GR's a little better, but optically, they are really close.
For under 500, however, I think I would also look at 8.5 x 50 vortex on sale at SWFA. |
|
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
sorry, I think the Zens are 10 x 43, and both are better than a similarly configured Kahles.
|
|
Smileydawg1
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/22/2010 Location: Georgia Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have to decide between Zens or Vipers
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Zens.
|
|
-Matt
|
|
Smileydawg1
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/22/2010 Location: Georgia Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
7x36mm or 8x43mm?
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I am a fan of the 8X42 class. This should be another option in this price range, but is bigger and heavier:
http://swfa.com/Vortex-85x50-Razor-Binocular-P47963.aspx I have the 8X42 Razors and they are truly spectacular binoculars. |
|
-Matt
|
|
NDhunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/15/2006 Status: Offline Points: 601 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Smiley: It seems that there are many options out there, and I wonder how many of the posters here have even lifted a Kahles?
I am conservative by nature, and like to go with things I feel offer the best
value.
It may be good to think ahead with warranty and other considerations.
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
NDhunter,
If that wink is for me: Many posters here, like myself, are optics addicts (perhaps you are as well?) and beg or borrow (never steal) every optic we can get our hands on. Using the eyes God gave me, I have compared my friend's (now broken) Kahles 10X42s directly to my Meoptas and Zen Rays. When they return from Gamo, we will be comparing them directly to my Razors. I had to lift the Kahles many times in order to look through them. I love this forum because I have gotten great advice, and I try to extend my experiences to others, to help them on their own optics journey. I only comment on optics I have experience with. Now you don't have to wonder about this poster. |
|
-Matt
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Or that wink could have been aimed at me as well. Trust me Jerry, I have looked at Kahles binoculars. I would not have made any comment about them unless I had done so. They are OK, just never appealed much to me, or my conservative nature, for whatever reason.
Smileydawg,
I really prefer the 7x36 ZEN ED 2 over the 8x43. It is my main go to glass. Makes a nice combo with the 10x43 big brother. My own entirely personal observation is that I can see no difference in image detail between 7x or 8x. For me they are too close to alike to matter much. However, the 7x36 has a very noticeably deeper depth of focus than the 8x. This is largely a function of the depth of focus being larger with lesser magnifications. The 7x36 Z ED2 is nearly focus free, not entirely, but you will not need it too often. That coupled with the wide fov it has makes for a 3-D image presentation not often seen in roof prism binoculars.
Forestalling some maybe to appear comments, one of the things that seems to raise some angst in binocular users is in how an individual perceives image performance at the outer edges of the field. Some require sharp to the edge performance and can't tolerate edge fuzziness. I really have no idea of how big a percentage of users fit here. I suspect that if my understanding of human optics is correct in that we are center field viewers, that most people are not too terribly bothered by the slightly fuzzy edge. Those that don't like, it really don't like it, and are really vocal about it. So I have no idea where you are on this spectrum. However, if you want completely sharp to the edge performance the 7x36 may not be for you, because it does have a ring of fuzziness around the edge that has drawn the ire of some. So if you are, as I suspect most are, not too terribly distressed about some edge distortion, I'd seriously consider giving the 7x36 a go. What edge distortion there is does not bother me personally. I have to stop viewing, force myself to take a look at what's going on at the edge of the field. When I do that, yes there is some distortion there. In reality there is some degree of edge distortion present in almost any binocular. Also the very wide fov of the 7x36 tends to perhaps magnify the presence of edge distortion. It is kind of hard to maintain a flat, edge sharp field across that much fov. If they would have used a different field stop to narrow up the fov to mask the distortion, then those other users who want all the fov they can get would be unhappy. Binocular designers walk a fine line. Edited by Klamath - December/02/2010 at 00:13 |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
Smileydawg1
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/22/2010 Location: Georgia Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Steve, you are correct in order to see edge clarity you have to readjust eye focus to see what’s going on there. Also, I just want to thank everybody for their help Matt, Steve and others. I have been reading posts here for a little over a year but never posted. I will be an active poster now and will pass on any information I may have that is what makes these forums so great. I think 7x36 will suite my needs the best. |
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You should be happy with then I think. Another thing I like about it over the 8x43 is that it is smaller. While it is not a compact in the sense of being larger than the majority of the 30mm+ crowd, they are enough smaller to make a noticeable difference packing them around all day over hill and dale. Not so much for their lighter weight, but for the physically smaller footprint makes them less noticeable.
|
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
Bird Watcher
Optics Master Joined: August/30/2006 Status: Offline Points: 1523 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Steve,
When are you going to give us some feedback on the 9x36?
Stan
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |