Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
VX OR Z5 |
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Author | ||
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
EDIT:
never mind, I see the "4."
Little optomistic on scores though. Edited by Bitterroot Bulls - January/28/2013 at 15:52 |
||
-Matt
|
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
782/4= 195.5. As I said in the post, the one on the left is his son's first buck, the other 4 are his.
|
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
First we have guys recommending glass they've never laid eyes on, then we have a mule deer expert scoring bucks from an internet picture. Go figure. BB, our buddy is a certified B&C scorer and he'd beg to differ my friend. Believe what you want though if it makes you feel better. I could post another dozen pics of big bucks that were scored and I'd guess you'd be off the mark on them too.
|
||
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Got under yer skin, eh JG?
Thanks for expert status, I do love hunting those things.
They are great looking deer, whatever the score!
My apologies to the OP for the threadjack.
|
||
-Matt
|
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Internet comments most definitely do not get under my skin. I just hate stupid statements that are nothing more than stupid statements. My apologies to the OP for getting this subject off track.
|
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I've been as critical of Leupold as anyone in the past. I think they've rested on their laurels too much, became too complacent and possibly arrogant and let their competition catch up and surpass them. They've had a real problem with canted reticles. I've seen more canted Leupy reticles than all other brands combined, though that's admittedly an anecdotal observation with no data to back it up. Their side focus mechanics have suffered from backlash in the past. I've owned many of their scopes at all price levels except their "top of the line" stuff at one time or another, and still own several.
I have to say, I've been very impressed with their newest VX-3 and VX-6 series scopes! Although I wish they would evolve toward fixed eye relief or at least narrow ER variation across the board, but in all other respects, I believe they've made tremendous improvements in recent years and don't get the credit they deserve for doing so. I'm referring to their hunting scopes here, not their "tactical" stuff. I'm an unabashed Swaro slut as well, own several of their scopes, and have been thrilled with everything Swaro I've ever owned / used. I haven't compared a Z5 scope head-to-head with a VX-6, so I can't comment on the IQ advantages of one over the other, if any exist. For argument's sake, let's assume the claims made here are correct and the Z5 is better. By "better," I'm referring to image quality, since it would be difficult if not impossible for any of us to use and abuse a large enough representative sampling necessary to determine which is more prone to failure mechanically. I trust Koshkin's assessment of IQ between these two scopes, but I also know that when two optics of similar IQ are compared, different eyes will see things differently, and reasonable arguments can be made for either optic, depending on which set of optical characteristics the viewer prefers. BUT... let's be realistic here. If the Z5 is indeed "better," then this fact is reflected in its higher price tag. If we accept the premise that Z5 is better than VX-6, and I have no reason to doubt that... well, VX-6 is also considerably less expensive. At the same time, it offers 6:1 zoom ratio vs. Z5's 5:1, so given the very real optical improvements Leupold has made with the VX-6, I personally think its a decent value at its price point. After all, we're comparing 2 scopes with up to $400 price difference here. A hunter equipped with either scope will be very well equipped with an excellent optic more than suitable for any big game hunting, anywhere in the world, in any legal light condition. What I don't get is when Leupold finally improves their product to achieve equivalent performance levels as their competition at the same price point, they're still frequently criticized for being "overpriced for what you get" and the competing scopes at similar price/performance almost never are. I don't see how anyone who has really seen and used a new VX-3 doesn't come to the conclusion that they are fully comparable to Zeiss Conquest MC (the 3X zoom variation). The VX-6 is a step above, offers optical performance in the same league as Swaro, is priced less than Z5, but offers 6:1 zoom. Seems reasonably priced for the performance vs. tradeoffs to me. Unlike Leupold's previous forays into so-called "alpha class" scopes, I think the VX-6 is actually worth its asking price. RC, which VX-6 scopes have you used, and what did you compare them to? |
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
BTW, though it wasn't one of the two choices, the Leica ER was mentioned a few posts ago. I have a 2.5-10X42 with German #1 reticle, and I'm here to tell you without reservation, it's as good as scopes get. I've compared it directly to Swaro Z6 and Zeiss Victory, and one would be picking some very tiny nits to say conclusively one is "better" than the other. I like things about the Leica ER better than the other alpha scopes, however. The short eyepiece housing design Leica uses provides a bit longer main tube without increasing OAL, which is handy for greater mounting flexibility... especially with a scope with such generous eye relief. I'm also a fan of the "Leica view," characterized by their enhanced contrast. Yes, their plex reticle is very thin... but the German #1 reticle I have is as bold as reticles get.
|
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
rustic
Optics Master Joined: September/30/2011 Status: Offline Points: 1461 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have for one have been more than impressed by CDS it works well in all weather conditions/temps/elevations. A vx3 in your preferred mag. range w/CDS is far more attractive product than vx6 IMO... not to mention the proven track record of the vx3. JG By the way bitterroot bulls is very good at judging mule deer near and far... I found out the hard way. ;) |
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Very well said Rifle. I can't disagree with any of that. What I'm most baffled by when it comes to Leupold right now, is the lack of a "rainguard" type coating. They're really missing the boat by at least not adding it to the VX3/VX6.
rustic, he may be good at it if he sees one in person, but he's not worth a crap at judging them via internet pics.
|
||
Jon A
Optics Journeyman Joined: March/14/2008 Location: Everett, WA Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It adds capability which can be useful in some situations. You will not see fine details as well with any typical carry weight 8X-10X binos as you will with a quality 18X scope, they simply aren't as good a tool for the job. For finding the deer, yes, very much so. For verifying point count meets legal/game management/personal requirements at long range, not so much. Of course if hunting with a low power scope they're the best you've got unless you bust out the spotter. If one decides he has no need or want for such capability that's fine, but it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. |
||
BobbyH
Optics Apprentice Joined: April/25/2012 Location: ARKANSAS Status: Offline Points: 137 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
+1 with Rifle's comments!
|
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
+1 Jon A, that all sounds great, but I prefer a spotter for verification purposes.
|
||
Jon A
Optics Journeyman Joined: March/14/2008 Location: Everett, WA Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Of course, everybody does in a perfect world. But for many situations, a tool that takes a minute or more to dig out of your pack and set up to accomplish a task another tool can accomplish in two seconds before pressing the trigger is not an equal substitute. Whitetails don't always allow one the luxury of setting up a spotting scope.
My wife has no use for a welder. That doesn't make it a useless tool for everybody simply because she has no desire to use it. |
||
Roy Finn
MODERATOR Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4856 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I agree that they've missed the boat by not offering those coatings. Leupold does have a repeat customer base that's not impressed with most anything you throw at them too though. Some of those old timer's wear archaic thechnology like a badge of honor. Tell them that a Leupold 4x28 has the worst light transmission of any scope you have used and they tell you the biggest bucks are killed at high noon.
|
||
338LAPUASLAP
Optics Master Scope Swapper Joined: October/17/2009 Status: Offline Points: 2596 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
No one
|
||
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |