Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
New SWFA SS 3-15x42 FFP |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 9> |
Author | |||||
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13181 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
After a brief consultation with myself... Take a look at any scope you have. Imagine where the front focal plane in that scope is (whether it contains a reticle or not). Typically, it is either right under the turrets or right in front of them. Estimate how far back from the objective lens that front focal plane is. For a scope like the new 3-15x42 SS, it is somewhere between four and five inches. This distance is called the focal length. All of the light that hits the objective lens, while traversing that distance between the objective lens and the FFP, somehow throttles down to a very small diameter beam. The lenses in the objective lens system (and their number varies between scopes) are designed to guide the light path in a specific way by having it bend inward for lack of a better term. The more you have to get the light path to "bend" the harder it is to do so without picking up aberrations. If the new SS had a larger objective lens with the same overall length, it would be that much harder to keep all of the image artefacts in check. It would either require additional lenses or more complicated lens shapes. Of course, for a larger objective lens, you could go with an overall longer scope with a longer objective focal length, but if you make a scope too long you run into other issues, both optical and mechanical. The rest of the scope's optics would need to scale up accordingly. The diameter of the focal plane would go up. Adjustment range would go down (unless you used a larger tube). Then there would be a mechanical problem with having the mass of the objective bell far forward and away from the mount, putting additional stress on the tube under recoil, etc. Scope design is an exercise in compromises. When I see a moderately priced scope that is very short with a large objective lens, I get concerned. The SS looks like it was designed with an eye out for manufacturability. ILya
|
|||||
BeltFed
Optics Retard Joined: February/12/2008 Location: Ky Status: Offline Points: 22284 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Well, ILya, since you put it that way, the new 3-15x42 is perfect for what I need, and at the right price point
|
|||||
Life's concerns should be about the 120lb pack your trying to get to the top of the mountain, and not the rock in your boot.
|
|||||
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
All true, and I made no reference to price point or complexity, merely that MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE WOULD BE FOR A LARGER OBJECTIVE. It has advantages I like and am willing to pay for in many instances... one must choose his poison carefully. I am willing to sacrifice "cost" for "requirements". SWFA chose a "market"... I am proud to say that I will be a part of that market. In choosing a piece of hardware, one must consider all of the options, all of the trades... the objective size is NOT significant enough to "break" the deal on all the other advantages the SS 3-15x42 offers. The objective size, for ME, is adequate... no detriment. Near 3.0 exit pupil at max power is plenty good enough for me. Means I could shoot at light levels that would be illegal for most hunting and in cases where night hunting is allowed would be able to shoot at short distances under most moonlight conditions above "dead dark". There are trades in every scope selection... everything the 3-15x42 offers outweighs the things it does not, for me... for many, my considerations would not be considerations at all... I'm good with that. If you only shoot in "high light" conditions, 42mm is fine and at 10x it is fine for most people for most low light conditions... for me, a 3mm exit pupil is "good enough", though I would like MORE. Not a deal breaker and certainly should not concern most shooters.. Few shoot in the dark without additional aids. I like to push the envelop... under the right conditions. SWFA made exactly the right choice for the majority of potential users. I would probably have made the same choice... however, I would have made me ONE with a 56mm objective...
|
|||||
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|||||
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Thanks for taking the time to educate me. |
|||||
MZ5
Optics Apprentice Joined: July/03/2012 Location: Arizona, USA Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Interesting entry. A smaller (vs my 50mm) objective would make it ever so slightly easier to get cheek weld without so much padding/riser. OTOH, a $700 scope with the same glass as my couple-years-old 10x42 seems ...high. Can anyone directly compare this offering with the basically-same-price Weaver Tactical 3-15x50, optically-speaking?
|
|||||
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Your 10x is a fixed power. It is considerably more complex to build a variable power scope. Plus this one has a 5x erector. Plus you will spend $100 more for the Weaver 3-15x50. http://swfa.com/Weaver-3-15x50-Tactical-30mm-Rifle-Scope-P49448.aspx |
|||||
MZ5
Optics Apprentice Joined: July/03/2012 Location: Arizona, USA Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Whatever the 'complexities,' they're all built in to the Japanese-made Weaver already. The Weaver's feature set is also richer, and the objective lens more expensive, assuming same quality. The optical quality difference between the two scopes I mentioned and have on my rifles right now is huge. That's why I asked for/about an optical comparison. Hopefully the SS fixed power line has made large strides in optical quality since I got mine. A side-by-side would tell.
|
|||||
TRP_Operator
Optics Apprentice Joined: July/26/2005 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 67 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
After looking at the design and reading the information about this optic. For the price this just maybe the setup I need to complete my new Remington 700 in .308. Really like the low end at 3x and 15x will be more than enough for ringing steel at distance.
|
|||||
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
But is the Weaver designed to take the beating of a .50 cal and rifles like the M1A? I would be my left nut that the internals mechanisms between the two scopes are pretty drastic in the reliability dept. Not dogging the Weaver, but one of the best parts of the SS line has always been their strength. |
|||||
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|||||
MZ5
Optics Apprentice Joined: July/03/2012 Location: Arizona, USA Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Yes, my fixed non-HD SS seems very stout. Kinda mushy, but stout. I haven't clubbed any baby seals with either it or the Weaver, but the Weaver _feels_ at least equally stout. Only time can answer your question about durability. I'm dialing them both back and forth all day at least a couple days a month. My SS sits on a heavy 223, so if it ever fails for any reason at all, I'll deem it deficient in comparison to a Tasco Varmint.
|
|||||
WYcoyote
Optics Apprentice Joined: April/06/2010 Location: Kane,WY Status: Offline Points: 154 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Glad to see this scope offered. I have been using the Weaver/Nitrex Super Slam/TR2 3-15x42 for a similar alternative. Of course they are 2nd FP with MOA turrets. But the configuration is excellent IMHO for an all around hunting scope.
|
|||||
badkarma
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/22/2013 Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
So, the $699.99 question...what time on the 25th can we click "add to cart" ? :)
Ready for a scope that I don't have to send back via UPS lol |
|||||
Shoalwater
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/22/2013 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Maybe I am looking at it wrong, but it looks like to me this is a fast focus eye piece without the lock. That is one of the things I really like about the 5-20, let be honest, once you set the focus on the eye piece you are not going to really be moving it. Am I just seeing things?
|
|||||
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13181 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
That is correct. All of the scopes in the Classic line have fast focus eyepieces. What I usually do is slip a flip up cap onto the eyepiece after focusing it. It holds the adjustment ring in place just fine (although I have never had one of the SS scopes shift eyepiece focus on me without it either). ILya
|
|||||
Jon A
Optics Journeyman Joined: March/14/2008 Location: Everett, WA Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
First the important stuff:
Reticle calibration and click value measure accurate within 0.5%. Reticle is square with the movement of the turrets within 1/2 degree. Tracking has been perfectly repeatable so far. Total elevation travel of my example: 41 Mils 26 Mils "up" available after a 100 yd zero when mounted in a 20 MOA mount. Now they only advertise 36 total so they may not all have as much as mine does, I'm just reporting what I see. The reticle on 3X, 10X and 15X: At the range: Size comparison with SS 3-9 and 5-20HD: It was a dark, gloomy day at the range which is not good for pictures. So don't attempt to judge the glass quality from these pics as it's impossible to take good pics through a scope in such conditions. 100 yds: 300 yds: A couple 100 and 300 yd targets: I was in somewhat of a hurry and not doing my best shooting, but even so 39 of 40 rounds went sub MOA. The eye relief on this scope is by far the best of all the Classic line, longer and more friendly than the well known fixed models. This will make the scope well suited for hard kicking hunting rifles among other things. I haven't spent much time comparing glass yet, but it looks at first blush pretty good, clearly the overall best of the Classic line. I was able to see the 6mm holes in the paper at 300 yds without too much trouble. But yes, you can see quite a bit more detail with the 5-20 HD as you should with more magnification and higher price. All in all I'm quite impressed with the scope for the price. Knowing how durable the classic line is, with all that elevation travel it has, this scope can do most things up to and including ELR use without spending a lot of money. |
|||||
c0d3x5
Optics GrassHopper Joined: December/24/2012 Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
can you post a pic of where it says "Made in ---" ? |
|||||
Jon A
Optics Journeyman Joined: March/14/2008 Location: Everett, WA Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
|
|||||
CROWSNIPER
Optics GrassHopper Joined: May/30/2004 Status: Offline Points: 48 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
These should easily out do the vortex PST if the glass is any good at all,i would have prefered a 50mm lens up front and no illumination is fine with me,never have used it on the scopes i owned that had it.
|
|||||
c0d3x5
Optics GrassHopper Joined: December/24/2012 Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I wasnt expecting these scopes to be made in Japan, wow that puts a damper on things..
I am torn between this scope now and the weaver 3-15x50 I hear good things about both scopes!
|
|||||
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
What is wrong with made in Japan? |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 9> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |