Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Burris FF2 vs. Weaver Grand Slam |
Post Reply |
Author | |
RICK WILKINSON
Optics Apprentice Joined: March/11/2004 Status: Offline Points: 37 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: August/18/2004 at 21:46 |
Which is better in lowlight? Burris FF2 3.5x10x50 LRS plex vs. Weaver Grand Slam 3.5x10x50 Dual - X. The one advantage on the Burris would be the illuminated plex, but the cost is around $75 more. Any opinions or comments appreciated.
|
|
ranburr
Optics Master Joined: May/16/2004 Status: Offline Points: 1082 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think the Burris is a pretty good scope for the money. I know that the Weaver has a lot going for it, I just do not care for this scope. I can't get used to that overly large power adjustment. That is just my bias and obviously a lot of people like the Weaver. ranburr |
|
redneckbmxer24
Optics Master Joined: June/02/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
im with you ranburr, i absolutely do not care for the wevear, the power adjustment being only one of the many reasons. (Go an other brand, wooooo hoooooo) cory |
|
redneckbmxer24
Optics Master Joined: June/02/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
just found a neat little icon i had never noticed hear before, so i just have to do this, no offense to any of you weaver guys BTW. weaver. (lol, sorry guys, i get a kick out of it though.) cory |
|
Chris Farris
TEAM SWFA - Admin swfa.com Joined: October/01/2003 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 8024 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think the Weaver Grand Slam is a brighter scope. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |