OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Mounts & Accessories > Rings and bases
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sako Optilock rings:  What goes wrong?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

Sako Optilock rings: What goes wrong?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Gunshow75 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/23/2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gunshow75 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sako Optilock rings: What goes wrong?
    Posted: October/26/2015 at 20:45
I received sage advice to consider replacing a set of Optilock rings on a Sako 85 rifle I recently acquired.  Based on a quick search of posts on this forum, it appears that I can safely replace them with a set of Talley rings.  That said, I wonder what Optilock weaknesses are?  Any personal experience will be appreciated. 


Tom



Back to Top
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 9042
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tahqua Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/26/2015 at 20:50
No help on your topic but great to see you here Tom!
Doug
Back to Top
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/27/2015 at 02:38
Originally posted by Gunshow75 Gunshow75 wrote:

That said, I wonder what Optilock weaknesses are?  Any personal experience will be appreciated. 

1) First, I'd say the big thing for me was that the Allen head, ring clamp screws are VERY soft. If your not extremely careful, you can round out slot easily. A harder torx head screw seems to me would be superior.

2) Even the low Opti's are a little too high for a moderately sized scope objective. I concluded that Opti's were made to facilitate a 50mm objective, or higher. I, on the other hand, prefer smaller scope objectives on my hunting rifles.    

3) Lastly, price. I paid roughly $135.00 for a set of Opti's for a Sako 75. For me, it just wasn't justified. 
I think Beretta was charging $13 for replacement screws I noted earlier. Just seemed like too much, for too little. 

I do think the limiter pin slot and the dove tail design they have is a stable one.   

I'd buy the sage that advised you to ditch them for Tally's a beer, I think.   
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.
Back to Top
bugsNbows View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
bowsNbugs

Joined: March/10/2008
Location: North Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11200
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bugsNbows Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/27/2015 at 08:08
^^^ This. The optilocks are heavy / bulky too. I like the polymer inserts though. My 75 now wears a Talley... and it's been dependable and trouble free.
If we're not suppose to eat animals...how come they're made of meat?
               Anomymous
Back to Top
Gunshow75 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/23/2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gunshow75 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/27/2015 at 11:01

Thanks, Doug.  I am happy to be back.

Cheaptrick and bugsNbows, I sincerely thank you for your replies.  The Optilocks that came with the rifle are 1" ringmounts, not the separate base/rings set.  I have another Sako that has a 30 mm set of the separate base/rings.  It has a Kahles cl 1.5-6x42 scope and I used it for four or five years without a problem.  Being a 338 Federal caliber, the recoil energy is about 20, and I haven't fired it more than a few hundred rounds.  Since my data set of ONE sample is relatively meaningless, I wanted to hear about the experiences of others. 

I plan to put a VX-3, 1.75-6x32, heavy duplex reticle, on the rifle.  My goal is to take it black bear hunting next May. 

Thanks again.  Smile




Tom



Back to Top
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
EVIL OPPRESSOR

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 16337
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RifleDude Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/27/2015 at 12:20
It's funny... when it comes to Optiloks, I really like the 1-piece "ringmount" design, but absolutely detest the 2 piece OL mounts with the separate bases. I think the former is a good design, but the latter is a lousy design for the reasons already stated. If you have the OL Ringmounts, I'd keep them. To me, when you already have integral dovetails machined into the receiver, they are your base and you don't need a separate base.

I'd keep the rings you already have. The only disadvantage I know of the OL ringmounts are that they're expensive. They might also have the soft screws, but you can replace the screws. I like the fact they have the self-centering polymer ring inserts, so they grip the scope well, don't bind the scope, and don't produce any ring marks.

If your rifle came with the 2-piece Optiloks, I'd ditch them in favor of the Talleys... or buy a set of the ringmounts.
Ted


Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle.
Back to Top
Gunshow75 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/23/2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gunshow75 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/28/2015 at 13:24

More sage advice.  Thank you, Ted. 

As regards 2 piece OL mounts with the separate bases, I have one of those from my 2006 purchase of an 85S in 338 Federal and I concur with your point of view on them.  The combo is so high that I had to use a comb raising kit that I tailored to the rifle/scope combination to get acceptable cheek weld and rapid alignment with the optical axis of the scope. The comb raising kit isn't aesthetically pleasing, but a few years of use proved them to be effective and stable.

My recent 85 came with a 1" "ringmount".  I will take your advice and try them with the 32mm objective.




Tom



Back to Top
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/28/2015 at 14:46
I used Leupold ring mounts with some success on a Sako M75 .300 WM.
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.
Back to Top
Gunshow75 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/23/2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gunshow75 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/28/2015 at 21:23

Again, thank you.  Your answer is an important example of how the experience of others can make us personally wiser, and it brings the following to mind.

A new topic initiates a member's request for other members to explain something or to share experiences that can help him/her make an effective decision or decisions.  IMO, the members of the Optics Talk Forum offer an amazing array of talent that can provide advice ranging from theoretical explanations to practical experience. 

I wish I knew how to personally say this to everyone, but for the privilege of membership, I thank the moderators, other members, and SWFA for accepting me as a participant in this impressive group. 



Tom



Back to Top
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/29/2015 at 05:01
Thank you, Tom. We are indeed very fortunate to have the exceptional membership we have here. 

SWFA has provided us this great medium we all enjoy.  
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.
Back to Top
bugsNbows View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
bowsNbugs

Joined: March/10/2008
Location: North Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11200
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bugsNbows Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/29/2015 at 06:52
Originally posted by Gunshow75 Gunshow75 wrote:

Again, thank you.  Your answer is an important example of how the experience of others can make us personally wiser, and it brings the following to mind.

A new topic initiates a member's request for other members to explain something or to share experiences that can help him/her make an effective decision or decisions.  IMO, the members of the Optics Talk Forum offer an amazing array of talent that can provide advice ranging from theoretical explanations to practical experience. 

I wish I knew how to personally say this to everyone, but for the privilege of membership, I thank the moderators, other members, and SWFA for accepting me as a participant in this impressive group. 



Nicely stated Sir! Excellent

If we're not suppose to eat animals...how come they're made of meat?
               Anomymous
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.395 seconds.