New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Looking for opinions on a low power variable
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Looking for opinions on a low power variable

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 09:54
MBar308 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: January/16/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 40
I've been lurking here for a little while now, but don't post often.

I am looking for a low(er) power variable for a whitetail rifle.

I have located the following and am looking for opinions:

1.8-5.5x38 Zeiss Conquest
1.5-6x42 Sightron SII

I am also interested in the following, but cant find any at the moment:

1.5-6x36 Bushnell Elite 4200
1.5-5x32 Burris Safari
1.5-6x40 Burris Signature Select

I am aware that all of these are discontinued.

If there are any current run, comparable scopes in the sub $300 price range, please advise.

What do you guys think? Does anyone have any experience with these?

Thanks!

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 10:15
Scrumbag View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: October/22/2013
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1526
The Zeiss is a nice scope in my view and bettr than the others on your list I have seen
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 10:21
mike650 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: May/14/2006
Location: West of Rockies
Status: Offline
Points: 13463
The 1.5-6x42 Sightron SII should be a good choice for under $300
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 11:48
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Online
Points: 15514
I have zero experience with Sightron scopes, but I've owned several Zeiss Conquests and Bushnell Elite 4200s. The 1.8-5.5X38 Conquest and Bushnell Elite 4200 1.5-6X36 are both very nice scopes.

The 1.8-5.5X38 Conquest is unusually long and heavy for a 1" tube scope of its magnification range, but otherwise, it's a great scope.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 13:05
MBar308 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: January/16/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Originally posted by RifleDude RifleDude wrote:

I have zero experience with Sightron scopes, but I've owned several Zeiss Conquests and Bushnell Elite 4200s. The 1.8-5.5X38 Conquest and Bushnell Elite 4200 1.5-6X36 are both very nice scopes.

The 1.8-5.5X38 Conquest is unusually long and heavy for a 1" tube scope of its magnification range, but otherwise, it's a great scope.

How does the Conquest compare to the Elite? Is there much difference?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 13:21
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Online
Points: 15514
The Conquest is a bit better optically, and I like the #20 reticle in the Conquest better than the Multi-X reticle offered in the 4200's. The #20 is one of my favorite plex style reticles. It has a near ideal thickness of the outer posts for good visibility in low light, the center crosshairs are nice and thin, and the outer posts extend closer to the center than most other plex reticles. 

On the other hand, if the Elite in question has the Firefly, I love that reticle even more than the Zeiss #20! it's Firefly-equipped, I'd be inclined to go with the Elite on that feature alone. Even though I think Conquest is a touch better optically, the Elite holds its own pretty well against the Conquest, and its not difficult to get good optical performance in a low magnification scope. In addition, the Elite has Rainguard outer lens coatings, which I think is a very nice feature on a hunting scope.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 18:26
MBar308 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: January/16/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 40
I should have stated that I'm looking for a heavier plex.

I once had a Nitrex that I thought was excellent--then I took it hunting and the thin Plex became virtually invisible well before legal time.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2018 at 23:17
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Online
Points: 15514
What reticles are in the Conquest and Elite?

If Conquest has the #20, its got medium thickness outer posts - not exactly "heavy," but plenty heavy enough IMO to be visible in extreme dim light. I have it in a few scopes, and if there's enough light that I identify a game animal, the reticle is visible enough that I can take the shot.

If the Elite has the Firefly reticle, it is heavier than the Zeiss #20. Plus, it has a luminescent coating on it, so it glows in low light. it's an excellent low light reticle!

If the Elite has the Multi-X reticle, it is thinner than the Zeiss #20, and I don't care for it.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Looking for opinions on a low power variable"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
There are no similar posts.


This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.