Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Low end scopes/SWFA |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: December/20/2006 at 13:14 |
It seems that most of the press on this forum goes to the high end scopes. Believe it or not, there are alot of people, probably the majority, that cannot afford a $700 rifle scope. I have seen some with those scopes that should have been saving money to buy a house, but that is there buisness. SWFA has a broad line-up of lower end scopes and as a dealer/seller of a reputable nature, I assume they must think that they have their place and are of reasonable quality. The question is, what do you guys feel about these lower end models, what place do they have in someones rifle collection and SWFA, what is your comment as to the quality of these scopes and what are your lower end recommendations and why?
|
|
Trinidad
Optics Master Joined: May/04/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hello Dolphin, for a long time we were talking alot about low end scopes. I am partly to blame for alot of the recent talk on high end scopes. All of the info is still here,just use the search engine and you will see tons of great info on every brand from all of us. If you notice in the Tactical section the most popular recent post is on a $200 scope. For the most part how it works is people ask about a paticular scope and we give our opinion, alot of people recently have been enquiring on what I would call mid priced scopes and this is a good thing in my book.
Edited by SVD666 |
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Really?? I honestly never thought that this forum "pimped" high dollar scopes that much. The S&B's, the VM/V's, Swaro's, etc. Unless someone had a big dollar budget and asked specifically what scope to get. Those were usually someone that was trying to decide between a S&B or a Zeiss Diavari.
I have seen many, many more $300 recommendations than I have $700 scope recommendations.
Recently, some of the gang have been talking up the Kahles CL. But this forum tends to recommend Bushnell 4200's, Burris FFII, Nikon BM's, SS's, etc day, in day out.
|
|
jonbravado
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Status: Offline Points: 1131 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
i think it's a good balance and there are experts on many different levels.
i am proud to be a member here - it's a great mix.
J |
|
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I know there is a good mix, but I guess since SWFA does offer these inexpensive scopes, I am curious as to what experiences you guys may have had, as most of them I have never owned and even more curious as to what SWFA has to say, since they sell them. I love the Elites and Sightrons, all you guys know that, I can afford them. But every now and then, I really like to find a real bargain scope. Any out there that SWFA has, that you guys have experience with?
|
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Best buy in optics on planet earth!! The Super Sniper!! |
|
TPS_Phil
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/14/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 339 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Can't touch anything better for the price!!!!! |
|
We refuse to compromise our quality for pricing.
100% USA Made. |
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Dolphin, when you say low end scopes, you should try to be more specific. What price range is low end in your understanding? If you are trying to get some feedback on this I would suggest you do this: subdivide the market into five or six different price ranges and ask about those price ranges specifically.
There are decent scopes out there for as little as $100-$150 dollars. While not as good as high end stuff, they are serviceable for the average hunter. ILya |
|
ceylonc
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/13/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 514 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree, the Super Sniper offers a huge value in the optics world. First class performance under $300! My "top 3" scopes (after the SS) as far as optical quality and reliablity are concerned are: 1) Zeiss Conquest 3x9 40mm; 2) Bushnell Elite 4200 2.5x10 40mm 3) Burris Fullfield II 4.5x14 42mm All are priced under $400 from SWFA. Honorable mention include Sightron S II (would make the top 3 but not offered by SWFA), Weaver Grand Slam, and Nikon Buckmasters. |
|
Trinidad
Optics Master Joined: May/04/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Bringing price into this post is not fair. |
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Why?
In a thread like this it really has to be defined what is a low end scope.
Super Sniper is a great deal, but I know quite a few people who will not pay $300 for a scope. Some can afford it, but do not a think a scope is worth $300 and some can't afford it at all.
To me a low end scope is something that costs less than $150. Scopes like Burris FFII and Nikon Buckmaster are really where midrange scopes begin. Super Sniper, Sightron S2, Elite 4200, etc are all midrange scope lines in my understanding of the word. Similarly, while I am willing to pay a certain amount of money for a nice scope, buying a S&B or a US Optics or Zeiss VM/V, for example, is completely out of the question. To me, no scope is worth that much money regardless of how good it is. The most expensive scopes I have are IOR 2-12x32 and 2.5-10x42FFP, and I am probably going to sell one of them. Still, both were well under a grand each when I bought them.
As far as bang for the buck goes, I think anything beyond Elite 4200 is already a case of dimishing returns.
Now, if this was something I did for a living, I am sure my opinion would be different.
ILya |
|
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree with ILya as for $150 being the cut off. Ditto for diminshing returns after the 4200. I think that the Kahles are getting a lot of attention here because on the high end they offer a lot of value along with excellent optics. They run less than the top drawer Zeiss and Swarovski's, too. One thing for sure, someone posts asking for cheap optics they will get plenty of replies. They might not like what they see but most of the good folks here don't buy optics that come in blister packs. They will try to convince someone to buy up if they can afford it. If not, I have seen plenty of suggestions for under $150.
|
|
SwattedOut
Optics GrassHopper Joined: October/30/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 54 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think there are many reasons that some people choose the high end scopes. There's always the bragging rights thing. I personlly don't get caught up in this but it is a factor. Also, if you spend alot of time shooting or shooting in matches, I don't see anything wrong with having the best. It can also keep you out of the trap of buying the latest mid level scope every couple of years when you could bite the bullet(if you have the money) and go top end and keep it for a very long time.As far as hunting, it doesn't matter if I can see every hair on the deer through a clear scope. However, what does matter is that last shot at dark and the ability of the scope to hold zero. I've said many times that the average deer hunter could be successful with any of the name brand scopes, regardless of price or model.It seems almost unbelievable now, but years ago I was sent to sniper school with a mid level Simmons scope. I pretty much kicked butt until it broke. But it was a hoot outshooting the pretty boys with that thing. |
|
ceylonc
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/13/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 514 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here's my $.02 on scope price points & why I justify buying the ridiculously priced stuff . I also say that owning a $1,000+ scope really isn't unrealistic when you think about the following: 1) Most of us have at least 3 rifles that wear individual scopes. I'd venture to say that, on average, each of us spent at least $300-400 (again, on average) per scope.; 2) Assuming I am correct, then most of us have around $1,200 invested in 3 different scopes on 3 different rifles. 3) Depending on useage & needs, we're either "somewhat satified" or "satisfied" but not "totally content" or "100% happy" with each scope as we had to buy a scope that would do the job IN YOUR RESPECTIVE BUDGET; 4) If you're not totally thrilled with each respective scope, it is probably due to visiting this forum and realizing that there are some GREAT scopes out there that do the job better than the scope you had to settle with; 5) SUPPOSE you decide to sell each scope and you get 80% resale value. So, your initial $1,200 invested in three scopes is now $960 in cash; 6) SUPPOSE you decide to mount a one-piece picatinny scope base to each rifle. You now have a universal scope mounting base where one scope easily swaps between your three rifles; 7) With your cash in hand, go out & buy a Kahles CL (or any other premium scope with great glass & awesome tracking), zero it in on the rifle you shoot most, and swap out & zero on the other two rifles, each time jotting down your dope changes per rifle.
I know this is dragging out but I have one more justification. Target shooting is my only hobby and hunting deer & hogs has become my obsession. With my time constraints being what they are (married, 2 yr. old son, do shift work at a chemical plant), I don't want to waste time dealing with sub-standard to average equipment. The way I figure it, I'll never be the guy with the biggest house, the nicest car, or take the best vacations. BUT, I'll own the best equipment I can afford in pursuing the two passions I'm allowed to have. Just yesterday I was thinking how bizarre it is that the 3 rifles I had in my truck (2 A-bolts with a Kahles CL and Zeiss Diavari VM/V and a Savage 10FP-LE1 with IOR 35mm) are worth as much or MORE than the resale of the truck I drive everyday ('89 Chevy 1500 4x4 w/extended cab & long bed)!!! Does this make rational sense: NO! However, it works for me and I'm very happy with the equipment I'm allowed to enjoy when time allows... |
|
silver
Optics Master Joined: November/04/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2291 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Let me offer a differant perspective...In resent court case in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania the court ruled that the land owner was ten percent and the hunter was nintey percent responcable for a hunting related shooting. The hunter was on a one hundred and seventy acre farm. Outside of the farm and across the road a woman was shot as the hunter missed a shot at a deer. A rule two and a rule four problem to say the least. As our hunting and shooting areas become more crowded, we have to take more steps to insure that we have a clean shot.
A couple of years ago I would have agreed with everything that was in the post; now, I do not. I think that legal liablity will continue to drive trends in our sports, just like it is everyplace else. I think that the standards have been raised, but people are still "naping." A better than "good" standard should be applied to equiptment, for classic "CYA" reasons. I think that this is extra true in the area of optics. Edited by silver |
|
"If we weren't all crazy we, We would go insane." Jimmie Buffet
WWW.formitch.com |
|
ceylonc
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/13/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 514 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
silver,
That's an interesting perspective I've yet to consider. I see where you're coming from...
The lawyers certainly have changed the rules of our society. Heck, I'm married to one and she sure rocked my perfect little world |
|
Tip69
Optics Master Extraordinaire Tip Stick Joined: September/27/2005 Location: Nebraska Status: Offline Points: 4155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
ceylonc.... makes sense to me!
Koshkin...... you rock!
Now lets get down to the meat of this post....... LOW END SCOPES.
I think what we're talking about here is a scope that the average Deer Hunter needs. Believe it or not, but most deer hunters shoot maybe 2 boxes of shells thru their gun a year! I'm not kidding. I worked at Dick's Sporting Goods for about a year and half and now I work at Cabela's. By far and away, most of the folks coming in and buying ammo tell me this. Those guys don't need a scope over $199.99. They really don't. They aren't trying to kill the next B&C buck. They just need to be able to tell if its a DEER. They shoot a few times to make sure their gun in on..... and then go hunting. If they kill a deer with the first shot, they are done shooting until next year.
These guys/gals want a scope that will last a long time without having issues. They don't have to have great class or be able to see a deer 300 yds away with just 1 minute of "legal" shooting light left. |
|
take em!
|
|
Trinidad
Optics Master Joined: May/04/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Great posts guys. To me 300$ should be the minimum amount to spend on a quality optic, this is the price range where glass quality,tracking and overall construction really start to come together IMO. There are a few rare exeptions to the 300$ rule such as the 4200 3-9 some SII's and a few other scopes but bellow this point shooters are in high risk of a inferior product and time wasted, therefore these lower end scopes should not be considered. There are many quality scopes with fierce competition,lets not settle and demand more for less. Consumers dictate the market IMO, do not take what "they" want you to. Edited by SVD666 |
|
TPS_Phil
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/14/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 339 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
One more good thing about the SuperSniper,
The resale value....
I see used one's, right at the price of purchase... |
|
We refuse to compromise our quality for pricing.
100% USA Made. |
|
Trinidad
Optics Master Joined: May/04/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
+1 the Super Sniper has some of the best resale value I have ever seen. |
|
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |