OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Firearms, Bows, and Ammunition > Reloading & Ballistics
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Short barrel 308 ammo recommendations
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

Short barrel 308 ammo recommendations

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Lockjaw View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: May/17/2016
Location: Chelsea
Status: Offline
Points: 434
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lockjaw Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Short barrel 308 ammo recommendations
    Posted: June/03/2016 at 05:34
I am doing a single purpose deer rifle. It's a Ruger Hawkeye, 16.5 in barrel. It's going to have a Zeiss Conquest Duralyt 2-8x42 on it. It's going to be a close quarters gun, mainly in thick cover.

Accuracy aside, what would be a good option for ammo selection? I was thinking about the 165 gr Hornady American Whitetail load. The gun shoots the 150 grain well, just thinking maybe a 165 might be a little better in thicker cover. 

I know the shorter barrel will knock some of the velocity down. I want to be able to anchor my deer. I've shot 2 deer with it using the 150 HAW ammo, both dropped in their tracks. They were just doe's tho. 

I have a box of Hornady 165 gr BTSP I got last year when one of my local gun stores was running a sale. I thought it was the 150 SST, which I had been buying as well. I think its basically the same as the AM ammo, just it has a boat tail instead of a flat base. 

I do not like Core Lokts, so please don't suggest them. 

Any benefit to a 165 over a 150? 
Back to Top
DCAMM94 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: April/19/2008
Location: Fort Worth
Status: Online
Points: 3484
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DCAMM94 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 05:49
In thick cover you're not going to need to worry too much about velocity.  Any of the bullets loaded in the ammo you suggest will have ample energy to expand at velocities from a 16.5" barrel within 200yds.  With that said, I think heavier is better for "anchoring" game, plus, the lower velocities produce less cavitation, and therefore less bloodshot meat.  When I was young, I used to think faster and flatter was better.  Now that I'm more experienced, if my hunting will be within max point blank range, I go with heavier bullets every time.  Hope this helps.
Although personally I am quite content with existing explosives, I feel we must not stand in the path of improvement. -Winston Churchill
Back to Top
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 9318
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rancid Coolaid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 08:56
Heavier is better.
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.
Back to Top
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 11814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote supertool73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 10:13
The only advatage lighter will have is possibly lighter recoil.

Heavier will retain more energy, penetrate deaper, retain better velocity, less wind drift. All around better option.
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
Back to Top
JGRaider View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: February/06/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1540
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JGRaider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 10:58
Nosler partition.  The standard by which every hunting bullet is judged, and has been for over 60 years.  I'd go heavier as well. 
Back to Top
Lockjaw View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: May/17/2016
Location: Chelsea
Status: Offline
Points: 434
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lockjaw Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 12:26
Well gun is 5.75 pound and no recoil pad. I'm adding about a pound and half for scope and rings. I didn't think it was to bad with 150 grain. Less than my 270 with 130s. And it's heavier to boot.
Back to Top
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 11814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote supertool73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 12:33
I have a 300 wsm that is right a 7 lbs. i shoot 180 grain out of it. U definitly notice when u pull the trigger. :).

I just bought a mossberg .308 with 16" barrel. Its great fun. I am a fan of short barrels for sure.

I would even consider 180s for your ruger. Lots of benefits to heavy
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
Back to Top
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 9318
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rancid Coolaid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 13:26
I hand load, so it's tough to make the "factory ammo" call.  My brush gun is an 16" barrel AR10 throwing 180 Barnes TTSX at about 2600FPS, and I love the setup.
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.
Back to Top
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13181
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote koshkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 23:33
180gr copper bullet at 2600 out of a 16" barrel is pretty peppy. I am sure you know what you are doing, but it would make me worry about pressure.

ILya
Back to Top
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13181
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote koshkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/03/2016 at 23:36
Originally posted by Lockjaw Lockjaw wrote:

Well gun is 5.75 pound and no recoil pad. I'm adding about a pound and half for scope and rings. I didn't think it was to bad with 150 grain. Less than my 270 with 130s. And it's heavier to boot.


I would start by getting a recoil pad. With ammo, i am with everyone else here: go with the heaviest quality bullet you can easily get.

ILya
Back to Top
Kickboxer View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 23679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kickboxer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/04/2016 at 09:32
Originally posted by koshkin koshkin wrote:

180gr copper bullet at 2600 out of a 16" barrel is pretty peppy. I am sure you know what you are doing, but it would make me worry about pressure.

ILya

I wouldn't, PERSONALLY, be particularly afraid of it, but have never seen the 180TTSX loaded above about 2650-2700fps out of a 16in barrel.  Please PM me some info on your load, RC…  If it is working well for you, I would love to try it.
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.

There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living
Back to Top
Steelbenz View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar
ROLL TIDE ROLL

Joined: January/03/2006
Location: Heart of Dixie
Status: Offline
Points: 5153
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Steelbenz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/04/2016 at 16:08
I use RL-17 with my heavies but out of a bolt gun not an AR platform.

"Don't argue with a fool! From a distance you can't really tell who's who!"
Back to Top
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 9318
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rancid Coolaid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/06/2016 at 11:56
Dan, I can't tell you, it is super secret, I don't use powder, I use C4 as the propellant and it is mall ninja---typo sorry, 2500 on the 180s, or thereabouts. Will look up the specs but it is a compressed load of varget over a bullet seated to max mag length.

2600 would be sporty indeed!
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.
Back to Top
Kickboxer View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 23679
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kickboxer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/07/2016 at 04:01

I just took a load, for a slightly larger bullet (approximately 1500gr) rated at max range of 4500 meters to 7300 meters.  There were definitely some overpressure signs in the brass, but the gun held up well.   Some of the brass was very old and showed extreme pressure signs, some of the newer stuff did very well.  No one had ever done it before, at least not "recorded". 




Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.

There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living
Back to Top
Lockjaw View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: May/17/2016
Location: Chelsea
Status: Offline
Points: 434
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lockjaw Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/07/2016 at 10:25
Originally posted by koshkin koshkin wrote:

Originally posted by Lockjaw Lockjaw wrote:

Well gun is 5.75 pound and no recoil pad. I'm adding about a pound and half for scope and rings. I didn't think it was to bad with 150 grain. Less than my 270 with 130s. And it's heavier to boot.


I would start by getting a recoil pad. With ammo, i am with everyone else here: go with the heaviest quality bullet you can easily get.

ILya
it is not bad really. I have same gun in stainless in 708 and its .25 pound heaver and easy on the shoulder. Of course I have dropped 30 pounds since last year so I might need a pad.
Back to Top
Stevel610 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: November/13/2015
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stevel610 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/07/2016 at 20:16
I have a Ruger RSI with 18.5" barrel in 30-06. It too is a brush gun. I'm making a load which mimics a 30-30. 150 gr. Sierra flat point using H4350. It shoots 1.5" at 100 yards. I haven't chrono'd it yet, but by load weight and velocity reduction for the short barrel, it should be just at 2390 fps.

I have a nice low power load using the same bullet with H4895 that shoots the same grouping. Only chrono'd at 2124 fps which makes it a 125 yard load.

Using a fixed 6x for load development, but will be switching to an NECG rear Ruger sight once the load is developed.

Back to Top
Stevel610 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: November/13/2015
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stevel610 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/07/2016 at 20:21
Using 150's because they group better than 165's or 180's out of this gun.
Back to Top
Lockjaw View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: May/17/2016
Location: Chelsea
Status: Offline
Points: 434
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lockjaw Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/08/2016 at 07:00
I don't want a low power load simply because I could be in a situation where I could be presented woth a longer shot. I killed a deer 2 years ago with this rifle off a PowerLine and it was easily 150+ yards.
Back to Top
Ernie Bishop View Drop Down
Optics Professional
Optics Professional
Avatar

Joined: January/26/2010
Location: Gillette, WY
Status: Offline
Points: 765
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ernie Bishop Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/09/2016 at 23:13
Hornady TAP (168 grain)
Ernie



"If you think you are perfect, just try walking on water."
Back to Top
nralifer View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: July/26/2016
Status: Offline
Points: 165
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nralifer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/16/2016 at 22:13
I have a 308 Savage action with a 20" Douglas barrel. It is my favorite hunting rifle. As far as what factory ammo to recommend I would try a variety of brands and settle on the one or two that shoots the best out of your rifle. Bullet placement is all important. Heavier is better, and 180 grain bullets do very well.
It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed. TR
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 1.236 seconds.