![]() |
|
Zen Ray 8x43 Review |
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Author | |
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 861 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Zen Ray 8x43 ReviewPosted: April/11/2009 at 13:28 |
Neither, the Japanese have been designing and manufacturing binocular optics much longer than the Chinese. However, as we are presently discovering, the Chinese, with the proper assistance, are now producing quality optical products.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Klamath
Optics Journeyman
Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 344 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April/11/2009 at 09:30 |
|
They are Chinese. I leave whatever political or cultural manifestations that invokes up to the individual.
|
|
|
Steve
|
|
|
|
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 861 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April/11/2009 at 06:57 |
|
Frank or Steve,
Are these three binoculars from China or Japan? Edited by Bird Watcher - April/11/2009 at 07:02 |
|
|
|
geezer
Optics Apprentice
Joined: October/22/2008 Location: Georgia Online Status: Offline Posts: 133 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/09/2009 at 14:12 |
|
I just got a pair of 8X43 Zen Ray ED's in last week. They are much nicer than I could have imagined. These will see a lot of field time. They are very clear and bright - I watched rabbits feeding on the other side of a field last night at approx 8:30 pm.
|
|
|
I would give you my two cents worth, but then you would probably have to give half to the gov't and what good is one penny
|
|
|
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice
Joined: February/02/2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 116 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/06/2009 at 17:24 |
|
Thank you. That's the information I was looking for. I think I will get a 10x43 once I have fund available.
|
|
|
|
Klamath
Optics Journeyman
Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 344 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/05/2009 at 22:48 |
|
The ZEN ED is 7" long eyecups extended This is the same size as the Swarovski EL and the Vortex Razor. There is room for two fingers between the hinges and there is enough room to get your fingers of one hand around the barrel. The gap between the barrels is about .75" on the ZEN. The picture Frank posted is a bit distorted.
Edited by Klamath - March/05/2009 at 22:50 |
|
|
Steve
|
|
|
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice
Joined: February/02/2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 116 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/05/2009 at 19:29 |
|
What's the dimension on the ZEN ED? I looked and could not find that information. Is there enough space to put your fingers in the open area? |
|
|
|
FrankD
Optics Journeyman
Joined: November/11/2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 433 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/28/2009 at 13:46 |
I tend to agree with everything Klamath posted. I don't have the Promasters in my possession in the moment but going by memory I would say the observations are spot-on. This is an excellent bin for the money!
|
|
|
Frank
|
|
|
|
Klamath
Optics Journeyman
Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 344 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/28/2009 at 11:14 |
|
I have both the Promaster ELX ED and the ZEN ED. The Promaster is 8x42, the ZEN in both 8x43 and 10x 43. They are very hard to seperate out. For instance while the ZEN is a wider fov, there are no repellent coatings like the Promaster. The Promaster had smooth rubber armour, the ZEN is stippled. As far as image clarity is concerned, you will look untill your eyes water and probably not find any difference. The look of the ZEN is a bit brighter.
|
|
|
Steve
|
|
|
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice
Joined: February/02/2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 116 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/28/2009 at 10:14 |
ahaa.. It was ane slim/tall binoculars, I was thinking after looking at the photo. Thanks for the review. I have their lower end binoculars and it is very good for the money. Do you see any benefit with wider field of view from ZEN?
|
|
|
|
FrankD
Optics Journeyman
Joined: November/11/2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 433 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/27/2009 at 20:29 |
|
lucytuma,
That is a difficult question to answer in that they don't really directly compare to any other bin out there...at least in one sense. They have the optical clarity, and overall specs (field of view, close focus, eye relief, etc..) of the Alpha bins. On that point I would respectfully challenge anyone but the most discriminating optics user to disagree. In my experience the Promaster and the Zen Ray might be a small bit ahead of the Hawke simply because the Hawke displays slightly more field curvature. Yet, the Promaster has a narrower field of view than either of the other two so that, too, has to be considered.
I guess what I would say is that if someone is looking for true Alpha level performance but cannot come close to affording it then these three binoculars are what I would direct them to.
...oh, and the pic is a bit distorted. The bins aren't anywhere near as long as they appear in the pic. It happened when I converted it to fit on the page. I will see if I can eventually rectify it.
|
|
|
Frank
|
|
|
|
lucytuma
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Online Status: Online Posts: 3590 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/27/2009 at 20:19 |
|
Frank, in your opinion what do these three binos (Hawk, Promaster & Zen Ray) compare too optically.
|
|
|
Yes Dear!
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |