![]() |
|
Zen Ray 8x43 Review |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |
FrankD
Optics Journeyman
Joined: November/11/2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 433 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Zen Ray 8x43 ReviewPosted: January/27/2009 at 20:06 |
|
I had decided earlier today to make a brief trip up to a local lake to take the dog for a walk. I put the neckstrap on the Minox BD BP porros in anticipation of taking them out on their first "field trip". Slight change of plans though. As I opened the front door I glanced down and noticed the "Priority Mail" box sitting on the front step. I was a bit surprised as I usually hear the doorbell ring when one of the delivery folks drops something off. The zero degree temperature last night must have done something to the doorbell mechanism as I wasn't able to get it to work either.
I grabbed the box and looked at the label. Sure enough it was the Zen Ray ED binoculars that I was keeping an eye out for. I threw them, and the dog, in the car and headed up to the lake. Upon reaching the parking area I tore open the box and took out a beautiful little set of binoculars. I say "beautiful" simply because I really do like the color scheme they have employed. They have the same color rubber armor as the Swaro ELs but with more distinctive black accents over the central bridge and in the eyecup area. Even the large red and white "Zen ED" logos located on the binocular look fairly tasteful...something I was not so sure of when I first saw the picture of them on the net. Since they were going out walking with me I had to put the neckstrap on (so much for the neckstrap hypothesis for "keepers" ). The neckstrap is a wonderful design in one sense and a bit of an annoyance in another. The positive aspect of it is that it is of the same design as the Vero Vellini that I use for the Meoptas. In others words the neck is fairly well padded and it has that handy little "quick disconnect" feature that leaves a portion of the neckstrap still secured to the binoculars. The reason I enjoy this design is because many times I just tote the binoculars around the house or out on the back porch. Both are places that I do not need to have a neckstrap attached. The negative? Well, even with the neckstrap tightened to its shortest setting the binoculars hang incredibly low on my 6' 4" frame. I would say at least to my belly button. If there was some way to shorten the strap further then I would most certainly be raving about the factory included neckstrap as I love the design. The rest of the accessories are entirely adequate. They come with a hardcase similar to that of the Hawke Frontier ED/Vortex Diamondback, etc... and the usual rainguard and objective covers. FWIW the box they came in looks pretty classy in all black with red and white "ZEN ED" inscribed upon it.Ok, enough of the niceties, lets get down to how they perform and function mechanically. Ergonomics/Mechanics Physically the binoculars seem practically identical to the Hawke Frontier EDs minus the color differences. They have the same solid feel and wonderful fit and finish to them. There isn't any play in the click-stop rotating eyecups...the focusing knob has good tension without any play in it and the central hinge is stiff enough not to move unnecessarily. Speaking of focus, when I initially pulled them out you could tell that they had been sitting in the cold for some time as the focusing knob was stiffer to turn than anything I remember (except maybe the Vanguard). This was initially a concern to me as I have memories of comments surrounding the stiff focus on the Vortex Razor initially. I immediately wanted to write them off as "less than adequate" for this reason but changed my mind after more extended usage. The focusing tension was still fairly stiff in the 15 degree F weather but I was able to turn it satisfactorily after working on it for a minute or two. As I sit typing this I am working the focusing knob again. It is much smoother at room temperature but still is a bit stiffer than what I remember the Promaster and possibly the Hawke. I do not believe anyone would have a major issue with this but I thought it was worthy of being mentioned. I find the overall ergonomics to be quite agreeable. It has the same texture and balance of that of the Hawke Frontier ED with slightly different texturing along the outer edge of each barrel. The physical weight of the binocular feels entirely acceptable for my tastes and I cannot imagine having a problem toting it around for an extended period of time. Optical performance Though it seems like an often used cliche in binocular reviews, this is where these binoculars really shine...pun intended. These binoculars are bright, sharp, largely free of distortion with a reasonably flat field of view and excellent chromatic aberration control. I would suggest they offer just as sharp and clean of an image as the Promaster EDs but with a larger field of view. Sounds similar to the Hawke's doesn't it? Well, it is except I would offer that this binocular, despite the same listed field of view seems to display slightly less field curvature and edge distortion than the Hawke Frontier ED. I would venture to say that it is a blend of the two from an optical perspective. I am hoping Kevin can chime in more on this issue as he has all three binoculars currently in his possession. Looking through these binoculars is a wonderful experience. You immediately get the feeling that you are there...next to the bird and not really looking through a binocular at all. As with the Promasters the image is "Alpha" sharp, bright and wonderfully colorful. The color representation is fairly neutral with the ever so slightest warm color bias. It is less than either the Meopta or the Hawke and possibly at the same level as the Promaster. With alot of snow on the ground it is somewhat noticeable. If this was spring or summer I would be willing to bet that I would have a hard time noticing it. At this moment I am looking out through the back window of my home at my bird feeders. There are goldfinches, pine siskins and a variety of other beautiful little birds in and around the feeders. It is a pure pleasure to look at them with the Zen Ray ED binoculars. They most certainly compare with anything I have in my selection at the present time and easily better many of them optically. For the $340-some dollars these can be had for right now I think they are just too good to pass up. They easily surpass the typical $300 roofs in so many ways that it would easily take me another half page to describe it. Take a hard look at these. They are beautiful "little" bins. Hopefully more to follow. ![]() |
|
|
Frank
|
|
|
|
lucytuma
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Online Status: Offline Posts: 3597 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/27/2009 at 20:19 |
|
Frank, in your opinion what do these three binos (Hawk, Promaster & Zen Ray) compare too optically.
|
|
|
Yes Dear!
|
|
|
|
FrankD
Optics Journeyman
Joined: November/11/2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 433 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/27/2009 at 20:29 |
|
lucytuma,
That is a difficult question to answer in that they don't really directly compare to any other bin out there...at least in one sense. They have the optical clarity, and overall specs (field of view, close focus, eye relief, etc..) of the Alpha bins. On that point I would respectfully challenge anyone but the most discriminating optics user to disagree. In my experience the Promaster and the Zen Ray might be a small bit ahead of the Hawke simply because the Hawke displays slightly more field curvature. Yet, the Promaster has a narrower field of view than either of the other two so that, too, has to be considered.
I guess what I would say is that if someone is looking for true Alpha level performance but cannot come close to affording it then these three binoculars are what I would direct them to.
...oh, and the pic is a bit distorted. The bins aren't anywhere near as long as they appear in the pic. It happened when I converted it to fit on the page. I will see if I can eventually rectify it.
|
|
|
Frank
|
|
|
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice
Joined: February/02/2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 118 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/28/2009 at 10:14 |
ahaa.. It was ane slim/tall binoculars, I was thinking after looking at the photo. Thanks for the review. I have their lower end binoculars and it is very good for the money. Do you see any benefit with wider field of view from ZEN?
|
|
|
|
Klamath
Optics Journeyman
Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 344 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/28/2009 at 11:14 |
|
I have both the Promaster ELX ED and the ZEN ED. The Promaster is 8x42, the ZEN in both 8x43 and 10x 43. They are very hard to seperate out. For instance while the ZEN is a wider fov, there are no repellent coatings like the Promaster. The Promaster had smooth rubber armour, the ZEN is stippled. As far as image clarity is concerned, you will look untill your eyes water and probably not find any difference. The look of the ZEN is a bit brighter.
|
|
|
Steve
|
|
|
|
FrankD
Optics Journeyman
Joined: November/11/2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 433 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January/28/2009 at 13:46 |
I tend to agree with everything Klamath posted. I don't have the Promasters in my possession in the moment but going by memory I would say the observations are spot-on. This is an excellent bin for the money!
|
|
|
Frank
|
|
|
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice
Joined: February/02/2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 118 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/05/2009 at 19:29 |
|
What's the dimension on the ZEN ED? I looked and could not find that information. Is there enough space to put your fingers in the open area? |
|
|
|
Klamath
Optics Journeyman
Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 344 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/05/2009 at 22:48 |
|
The ZEN ED is 7" long eyecups extended This is the same size as the Swarovski EL and the Vortex Razor. There is room for two fingers between the hinges and there is enough room to get your fingers of one hand around the barrel. The gap between the barrels is about .75" on the ZEN. The picture Frank posted is a bit distorted.
Edited by Klamath - March/05/2009 at 22:50 |
|
|
Steve
|
|
|
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice
Joined: February/02/2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 118 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/06/2009 at 17:24 |
|
Thank you. That's the information I was looking for. I think I will get a 10x43 once I have fund available.
|
|
|
|
geezer
Optics Apprentice
Joined: October/22/2008 Location: Georgia Online Status: Offline Posts: 133 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March/09/2009 at 14:12 |
|
I just got a pair of 8X43 Zen Ray ED's in last week. They are much nicer than I could have imagined. These will see a lot of field time. They are very clear and bright - I watched rabbits feeding on the other side of a field last night at approx 8:30 pm.
|
|
|
I would give you my two cents worth, but then you would probably have to give half to the gov't and what good is one penny
|
|
|
|
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 866 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April/11/2009 at 06:57 |
|
Frank or Steve,
Are these three binoculars from China or Japan? Edited by Bird Watcher - April/11/2009 at 07:02 |
|
|
|
Klamath
Optics Journeyman
Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 344 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April/11/2009 at 09:30 |
|
They are Chinese. I leave whatever political or cultural manifestations that invokes up to the individual.
|
|
|
Steve
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |