Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Vortex Viper PST VS Trijicon TR-23 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Prieto9000
Optics Apprentice Joined: March/12/2010 Location: Monterrey Status: Offline Points: 160 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: September/16/2010 at 23:56 |
Hey guys I read a review on the Trijicon TR-23 and they say it´s a superb scope for the price. What would you say about it?? Do you think it´s better than the PST?? It comes with a 5x-20x magnification which i think it´s great because it can be used for both hunting and shooting. IMO it´s the most balanced magnification ratio you can find.
I'm making the comparison because it falls around the same price range than the PST and i'm waiting for mine to be sent.
Edited by Prieto9000 - September/17/2010 at 00:46 |
|
billyburl2
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: January/08/2009 Location: Cottonwood, AZ Status: Offline Points: 4015 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The Tijicon will most likely have much better glass, but it only has 50 MOA of internal adjustment. The illumination systen Trijicon uses is also better IMO. But with the Viper you get turrets that match your reticle and a First Focal Plane scope that sub-tends at all mag levels, whereas the Trijicon is a Second Focal Plane and only sub-tends on one mag level without more math added. And at this time only MOA knobs are offered on the Trijicon. Basically it comes down to what features are more important to you for the money. |
|
If it is tourist season, why can't we shoot them?
|
|
SVT_Tactical
MODERATOR Chief Sackscratch Joined: December/17/2009 Location: NorthCackalacky Status: Offline Points: 31233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Like BB said you only have 50MOA internal elevation adjustmetn with the Trijicons, if that will get you as far as you normally shoot, It would be fine. The viper pst hasn't been released yet, the ones that where didn't hold up to par so they took them off the market and have started re-working them to met the high standards Vortex put on them. When they come out, I think they will be well worth every penny, but until they do, its not something many can weigh in on.
Edited by SVT_Tactical - September/17/2010 at 09:17 |
|
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't know that the Trijicon will have "much" better glass. The regular Viper glass is pretty dang nice. Accupoint glass may be a bit better, but not a whole lot. From what I have read the PST glass is a bit better than the regular Viper glass. So I bet they will be pretty close.
|
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
One is a known value (Trijicon) and one is an assumed value (the PST isn't out yet and probably not before year's end.)
On a 20MOA base, the Trijicon will get out past 1000 yards on .308+, if you need a 1400+ yard gun, neither Trijicon nor PST are what you need. If you want the Trijicon (5-20 mil dot, green illum), I have one for sale, it is a good scope. |
|
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
|
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't think so. The Viper PST supposedly has upgraded optics from the standard Viper. This would probably put it in the same general class as Trijicon, Conquest, etc. I haven't done a head to head comparison, but if the PST samples I saw at SHOT are any indication, the glass is very good... as best I could tell inside a convention center. I looked for CA and flare issues against the lighting inside the building, a rough evaluation of resolution against distant signs and fine details, field edge condition, tunnel effect, etc. and all looked quite good. It would probably take some pretty critical, extended viewing head to head with Trijicon to say conclusively that one was better than the other optically.
As has been noted, the PST line isn't available yet, so you aren't likely to get many, if any, comments on them. Those who have used one, such as Jon A on this forum, have only seen pre-production samples.
I can say without a doubt that the Trijicon TR23 is a superb scope... at least by my definition of "superb," taking into account its intended applications. Edited by RifleDude - September/17/2010 at 10:10 |
|
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
|
Jon A
Optics Journeyman Joined: March/14/2008 Location: Everett, WA Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't think you'll beat the combination of features, quality and low price the PST will have, but they are not yet available.
If interested in a scope in the TR23 range, add the Weaver 4-20 Tactical to the list. It doesn't have mil knobs either, but at least the reticle is FFP so you can use it at any power. Around 57 MOA of adjustment, long eye relief and excellent glass. I haven't messed with the TR23 so I can't say much about it other than if low light/close range woods hunting is on the menu it should do quite a bit better than the Weaver (which has no illumination). |
|
Prieto9000
Optics Apprentice Joined: March/12/2010 Location: Monterrey Status: Offline Points: 160 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thank you all for your comments. They both semm to be very nice scopes. I just hadn't heard about this TR-23 before.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |